Due to its robustness and flexibility VPS is one of the most popular internet services. Root access to server, own IP-address and port, full control over software, processes, and files… such a huge list of advantages makes VPS a real tidbit for web-developers. For all that VPS suffers from one shortcoming – its administration is quite complicated and time-consuming. It is clear that inexperienced users are usually confronted by difficulties concerning VPS management. That is why VPS host is subdivided into two types: managed and unmanaged.
The main difference between virtual managed server and unmanaged one is a scope of host company liability to users. Let’s do a quick review of both types, so you can make a reasoned decision about what services suit you best.
Unmanaged VPS is a server fully administrated by a user himself. In this case the user updates software, applies appropriate patches, works with the kernel, reclaims the operating system, and provides the security without hoster assistance. Service provider in its turn monitors the network state, troubleshoots technical problems, and tests the connection. Unmanaged VPS is a perfect decision for those who have huge experience in server administration.
Managed VPS is administrated and maintained by a host company offering this service. In such a case managed hosting providers accept the responsibility for software updating and patches applying, take safety precautions, immediately settle technical problems, monitor the network and test the connection. In other words, provider is responsible both for software and for hardware. Managed VPS is the best decision for inexpert users or those who has no time for self-management of the server.
Perhaps, the most evident distinction between described VPS types is their price. Since you are responsible for your unmanaged VPS, you pay less. Of course, managed hosting is always a more expensive decision as you actually pay for the technical skills and knowledge of your provider.
Choosing between unmanaged VPS and managed one, note: in the first case, the user gets the freedom to control the server of his own, while the second option saves the client money and time as the service payment is included in the package price.